Talk:Mitsubishi Ichigokan Museum, Tokyo

Japan: Tokyo Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 05:03, May 18, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Tokyo task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: Kako River (Japan)
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Pure Japanese, Vinland Saga (TV series), Japanese destroyer Ume (1944), Mai Fujisawa, Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Museums Low‑importance

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Early focus on building[edit]

I focused a lot on the building itself and it's architecture in these early posts because it really is authentic looking old style building. Once the museum is open and active I would fully support (and contribute to) adding a larger focus on the artwork.

Re: the building - I'm not just talking about the copper joints on the roof - which they have done a pretty good job on (but everyone can do that), but the whole thing. The brick work appears to be authentic. The large stone pieces are also very authentic looking. If they aren't real (as in solid) and they aren't old (as in the age/patina) then someone has done a very good job on them.

Downtown Marunouchi has a habbit of trying to mix old with new and it doesn't always work well. Both Marunouchi Building and Shin-Marunouchi building are built in the style of a new glass box skyscraper built on top of a base which is in the same shape/size (usually 3-5 stories and rounded corners) which attempts to mimic the original building that stood there in the early mid-1900s. The bases on both those buildigns are so modern looking that it is not a very convincing reproduction. Nearby Ginko-kyokai building (GKB) tried to do the new-on-top-of-old trick with a victorian red brick veneer which looks cheap... pick it up at a home supply store cheap... The corners are not convincing at all. Industry Club of Japan building is another example, and while better than the GKB it is still has you wondering if it is a new building made to look old.

Bottom line is that the new Mitsubishi Ichigokan Museum building looks very real, and very old, but just well-maintained... plus it doesn't have a 40 story glass box jutting out of the top. 7 23:30, 17 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mitsubishi Ichigokan Museum, Tokyo. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307202332/http://mimt.jp/english/pdf/mec080611e.pdf to http://mimt.jp/english/pdf/mec080611e.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:52, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]