Talk:Misery (Gwen Stefani song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Azealia911 (talk · contribs) 23:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Full review coming soon. Azealia911 _talk 23:37, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Lead and infobox

• Is the year that the song was recorded in the source for the studios that were used?
  • I'm pretty sure they are. She said she wrote "Misery" in 2015 and J. Tranter posted an Instagram clip of the song sometime ago this year of the song with a caption that read something similar to 'working on Gwen's new album, etc.'
• Remove "Finally".  Done
• Swap "but" for "and", she confirms some of what the critics speculated.  Done
• Remove "herself".  Done

Background and release

• Remove "extremely" and "deeply".  Done
• Link Entertainment Weekly.  Done

Composition and lyric video

• You're using a multiple image template but only using one image, originally I was going to suggest changing template, but how about adding a picture of Shelton and changing the caption to "Many critics believed "Misery" was written about Stefani's ex-husband, Gavin Rossdale (left), which she denied, confirming it was instead about Blake Shelton (right). ?
• Inquisitr is presented in italics.  Done
• "official YouTube Vevo account" → "official YouTube account"  Done

Critical reception

• For three articles you made, "Asking 4 It", "Rare" and "Truth, you use multiple album reviews for the critical reception sections, yet only single reviews here, don't be afraid to bulk up the section with multiple reviews.  Done

Charts

• Please use {{Singlechart}} templates.  Done
• Pop Digital Songs is a component of Digital Songs and is therefore ineligible for inclusion.  Done

Release history

• Was the song only released in the US?  Done

References

• Please check through your references ensuring that: All works are linked in their first use and none thereafter, you avoid using incorrect dashes, avoid SHOUTING IN TITLES, that all writers are credited, that all links work, that all dates and accessdates are included, that links suspectable to rotting are archived.  Done

Post-review comments

• It get's harder and harder to find faults when reviewing your articles Carbrera, another good'n. Let me know when you've addressed my comments. Azealia911 _talk 19:36, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
  • Hey thanks! I really appreciate all of your reviews with myself! @Azealia911: I have finished all of your concerns and comments now. Carbrera (talk) 23:21, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Further comments

• Some of your dates are MDY, some are DMY, be consistent.  Done
• Inquisitr should be in italics (you corrected it in the reference, missed it in the prose)  Done
• There are singlecharts templates for the ones you're still using full references for.
  • The UK chart can't use the template because it wouldn't be linked to the proper page displaying the peak position; "Misery" peaked outside of the Top 100, so it won't show up on the automatic page with that template. Carbrera (talk) 01:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

See here, there's a template for UK songs above the 100 position. There are also templates for US Bubbling and US Digital Azealia911 _talk

I fixed three of them; perhaps you could help me find the Digital template? I can't seem to find it. Carbrera (talk) 02:36, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

Added it for you, passing. Azealia911 _talk 11:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

• Ref #7 Idolator should be linked. Ref #18 NME should be linked. There are still WP:NDASH violations if reference titles. There's still SHOUTING. Please recheck your references.
  • @Azealia911: I added each edit individually so you could see I made each of the changes. Thanks again. Carbrera (talk) 01:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.