Talk:Miguel Ángel Mancera/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: QatarStarsLeague (talk · contribs) 15:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC) I am glad to review this article. The review should commence in a short while. QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:28, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead[edit]

As all the information corroborates with the article's body, the lead passes.

Infobox[edit]

Interesting that a politician is labeled as being associated with a political party, and represents them, but never physically joins the party. Fascinating. A pass here.

Early life and education[edit]

"When he was four, he lived in Tacuba neighborhood..." He lived in the Tacuba neighborhood.
"Mancera asked Victoria Adato Green, then-Attorney General of the Federal District, to pursue the case, assisted by consultor Diego Ramudia, and managed to sanction the responsible driver." Fine is probably a better term here.
"...and after he revalidated four subjects..." What exactly does that mean?
Everything else is good.

Career[edit]

Great section, and a pass, here.

Candidacy[edit]

"On January 6, 2012, Mancera resigned to become candidate... Resigned as attorney general you mean, right?
"but both politicians disassociated themselves the incident." From the incident it should read.
" ...a review the issue of solid waste..." A review of the issue of solid waste, it should read.
Everything else is good here.

Personal life[edit]

"From 2008 to 2009, Mancera dated Alejandra Barrales." Who is that? Can you elaborate?
Everything else is good.

Conclusion[edit]

The bibliography is fine, and the images are good for usage, so as soon as these current issues are addressed, I can pass this nice, succinct little article. Congratulations! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 03:22, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

All done. I made a minor changes, and I replaced the main image while the review was made. I also removed the "and after he revalidated four subjects", it also concerned the user who made the PR, and I don't know how I can translate it correctly. Thank you for choose the article and your review. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:33, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]