Talk:Microsoft Silverlight

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Microsoft Silverlight article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2: 100 days

Microsoft Silverlight was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 2, 2007	Good article nominee	Not listed

Microsoft: .NET High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject .NET (assessed as High-importance).

Computing: Software High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Misses the point[edit]

Silverlight was to provide Microsoft with a rich web experience comparable to Adobe Flash. When Apple Steve Jobs announced in 2010 that Flash was not going to be on the iPhone, iPad - Microsoft was unlikely to get Silverlight on Apple devices. Combine that with the near completion status of HTML5 in 2012, the need for binary compiled code plugins for web browsers was losing market share. Microsoft abandoned forward Silverlight development as it was not massively adopted by paying corporate customers. Remember, corporate technology decision makers got cold feet when no versions of Windows NT and no versions of SQL SErver were released from 2001 - 2005 even though Microsoft sold a pay as you go licensing scheme in 2000 promising more frequent releases. Combine all and you get reluctant corporate decision makers which did not want to adopt yet another possibly dead Microsoft technology. It's common for companies to wait 1 to 2 years after a tecnology is released to evaluate it for implementation to ensure 1) the technology will be supported with one or more major release already released, 2) the software vendor has long term commitment to supporting the product, 3) A decent sized and growing pool of possible workers to staff projects, 4) A good sized and growing third party support for add-ins and extras. Also, a competing rich web environment ASP.NET MVC was in version 2 as of 2010. Hence, no rush to adopt Silverlight. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:D591:5F10:70A2:25C5:A17C:82ED (talk) 04:39, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Microsoft Silverlight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Microsoft harming the open nature of the World Wide Web[edit]

Article says "Silverlight's proprietary nature is a concern to competition since it may harm the open nature of the World Wide Web. Advocates of free software are also concerned Silverlight could be another example of Microsoft's embrace, extend and extinguish strategy." Really? Still, in 2018? Nurg (talk) 02:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update[edit]

Today is 12 October 2021. Is there confirmation that Microsoft has terminated support for Silverlight? JIP | Talk 12:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputing the statement about XAML being a bad idea[edit]

I think that the following statement is at least inaccurate: Internally, even proponents of the technology thought Extensible Application Markup Language as a concept was a bad idea from the start. A blog page is provided as a reference, but I think that what the author of the blog was saying is not that XAML was a bad idea per se, but that XAML without a design tool was a bad idea (i.e. "XAML + notepad").--TheLoneTraveller (talk) 08:25, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]