Talk:Mick Malthouse

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 07:22, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mick Malthouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What was wrong with my picture?[edit]

I know it's not the best picture ever taken, but I couldn't find any other Malthouse pictures on Wikimedia. It's better than nothing, right?

2001:8003:103B:FC00:4DCE:BD5F:91A1:3972 (talk) 09:46, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not really. See MOS:LEADIMAGE. Among other things, it says "Lead images should be natural and appropriate representations of the topic". Yours hardly fits that requirement. HiLo48 (talk) 09:54, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's both of those things, but clearly you have more experience at this than I do. Can you explain what specifically is wrong with it? Is it because of all the logos in the background? 2001:8003:103B:FC00:4DCE:BD5F:91A1:3972 (talk) 09:59, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
For me, it's the crown. I simply wouldn't have recognised that as Mick without the caption. I know this is subjective stuff. This isn't an urgent issue. Can I suggest we leave this discussion open for a few days at least so that we can get the thoughts of other editors? HiLo48 (talk) 10:05, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, we can do that. I wear a crown all the time, so I thought this picture of Mick looked really cool. If everyone decides that it's not a good lead image, do you think it would be an okay image to put further down in the article? You know, to show the kinds of things Mick got up to when he wasn't coaching? 2001:8003:103B:FC00:4DCE:BD5F:91A1:3972 (talk) 10:11, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given that we havn't seen much response here, I've just posted a comment at the Talk pages of the clubs Mick has been associated with, seeking comment here. Let's see what happens. HiLo48 (talk) 03:20, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see anything wrong with including this image in the lead if it's the only one available. Although the crown is not ideal, the rest of it shows Malthouse pretty well. – Teratix 04:24, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given that no one else has raised any objections (and one person even wrote in support of it), I think we should re-insert the image. 2001:8003:103B:FC00:D02A:6112:2A53:D141 (talk) 01:41, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. HiLo48 (talk) 02:10, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. 2001:8003:103B:FC00:D02A:6112:2A53:D141 (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]