Talk:Metromile

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because the article was written as a spinoff on an article already written about usage-based insurance. Noticed that MetroMile was mentioned in that article but did not have its own Wikipedia article yet, and it is apparently the only company in the US that offers pay-per-mile insurance. This new article is elaborating on the company and service. If there is any advice on language that would help demonstrate the significance of this, would appreciate other editors to jump in. Thank you --MEG325 (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2015 (UTC)

"the only company offering pay-per-mile insurance"

This claim is simply not true... It was a year or two ago, but this should be edited.

https://www.esurance.com/pay-per-mile — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.218.15 (talk) 04:42, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Metromile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150903004003/http://www.yorkdispatch.com/breaking/ci_28715643/pay-per-mile-car-insurance-coming-disrupt-traditional to http://www.yorkdispatch.com/breaking/ci_28715643/pay-per-mile-car-insurance-coming-disrupt-traditional

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 26 January 2018 (UTC)