This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject TikTok, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of TikTok on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TikTokWikipedia:WikiProject TikTokTemplate:WikiProject TikTokTikTok articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiFun Police, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage and quality of fun articles on Wikipedia, including those tagged with {{humour}} and {{Humorantipolicy}}. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the Wikipedia talk:WikiFun Police discussion, see a list of open tasks, or submit a request for maintenance or coverage.WikiFun PoliceWikipedia:WikiFun PoliceTemplate:WikiProject FunWikiFun Police articles
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Melissa Ong appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 February 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that "Step Chickens" on TikTok replace their profile pictures with an image (shown) of Melissa Ong, whom they call "Mother Hen"?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
[1] this seems like a good source to add in if you fancy KINGofLETTUCE 👑🥬 19:41, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
My main concern is that the prose is not "tight" enuf. This reads too much like a puff piece with many superfluous "facts" about her and her "cult". I'm sure she's notable (although I find that bewildering...) but the article could use some trimming while the image is waiting to be cleared. KINGofLETTUCE 👑🥬 19:53, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kingoflettuce: argh! that's what happens when the sources get granular on silly things. I've done some culling – possibly take a look and point out any puffery that remains? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 23:00, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Will give it the holy tick once the image clears. Otherwise the article is new and long enough, with an interesting hook that's appropriately referenced. No evidence of copyvio. I would recommend removing the "(shown on the right)" for the benefit of mobile users, but that's about it. Merry Christmas! KINGofLETTUCE 👑🥬 12:16, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Theleekycauldron: The image seems to have been deleted. Do you wish to proceed without it anyway? BorgQueen (talk) 14:01, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BorgQueen: No, thank you, I'm fairly sure I'd rather wait. I'm in contact with the creator, waiting on her to do the necessary stuff to release the image. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 19:42, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I shall reach out one more time – we'll proceed without the image if it's not released within a week or so. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 22:34, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BorgQueen: Kol's been inactive for a few days, wanna give this the holy tick? You can just tick per him. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 21:24, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sure thing. But then I can't promote it now... lol BorgQueen (talk) 21:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It seems likely that Ong, an active public figure, will continue to garner coverage in the press, leaving an opening for further coverage that fills the gaps in. For GA status, I'd want to see articles that more thoroughly cover her background in tech and how that influenced her leap into public life. Information about her TikTok activities that don't include Step Chickening would be helpful; you know, just more stuff that's not about the Step Chickens so we can whittle that bit down. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 04:38, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.
I don't have a conflict of interest, but the subject reached out to me and asked me to remove the bit about her mining cryptocurrency. I think there's a fairly strong case to be made that the fragment supporting herself by dealing drugs and mining cryptocurrency is probably UNDUE from an ABOUTSELF source (even if somewhat reputably published). theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 03:46, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Y Done. You could have asked me earlier... BorgQueen (talk) 03:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My main concern is that the prose is not "tight" enuf. This reads too much like a puff piece with many superfluous "facts" about her and her "cult". I'm sure she's notable (although I find that bewildering...) but the article could use some trimming while the image is waiting to be cleared. KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 19:53, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Sure thing. But then I can't promote it now... lol BorgQueen (talk) 21:29, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Done. You could have asked me earlier... BorgQueen (talk) 03:42, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
