A fact from Mein Herze schwimmt im Blut, BWV 199 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 October 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
Nice little article. There is probably not a lot more narrative content to add, but I'd like to see just a bit of expansion in the following areas:
Would "history and words" be more appropriately titled "History and lyrics"?
"History and text" has been tried. 3 FAs, several GAs and 100+ normal articles have "words", as it's often biblical, and I don't feel that's "lyrics". --GA
Can that section be expanded? Perhaps the sources in the lead could be added to the main body text and the lead footnotes removed once that occurs.
Sources in the lead are needed for quotations. --GA
I found one not added by me and removed it. The same thing is in the body. Don't quite know how to expand the lead. For FA I would ;) --GA
I popped in a couple "cn" tags
Will look in a few minutes. --GA
I added some hidden comments to indicate my concerns, toss when read. If not simple fixes you can easily make, then toss the hidden text anyway but let me know what the situation is here.
Tried but confess that some questions were not clear to me, - please check, I left all which I didn't incorporate, please remove when clear.
I added some wikilinks and minor copyedits, toss what doesn't work for you.
All fine.
This article is close to GA, basically just needs a bit of copyediting for clarity and some minor expansion. Montanabw(talk) 02:20, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for looking and offering alternatives, some taken, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Y Your changes look sufficient to pass GA, most of the rest are just my personal preferences. Nice work! Montanabw(talk) 23:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]