Talk:Medieval Market of Turku

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Renaissance fair?[edit]

The article was added to Category:Renaissance fairs. I wonder whether the Medieval Market of Turku classifies as of Renaissance fair, which reems to give the term a meaning as a USA version of the theme. Adding the market to the category thus seems to suggest that the Turku medieval fair is closer to the tradition in the USA than to the European tradition. I am no expert on the subject, but I would like to see a reference or at least a discussion here, before accepting that.

--LPfi (talk) 16:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I made that categorization. Based on discussion at Talk:Renaissance fair#Not unique to the Anglophone world, User talk:Florian Blaschke#Terminology: Renaissance fair, de:Mittelaltermarkt, Medieval festival, and de:Diskussion:Mittelaltermarkt#Renaissance fairs und Mittelaltermärkte auf den Commons, it appears that Renaissance fair and de:Mittelaltermarkt are minor variants on the same activity: historically-inspired events oriented to entertainment and commerce rather than education and accuracy. The German Wikipedia article mentioned the Medieval Market of Turku, and even uses a photo of it in the lead. I have no personal knowledge of the Medieval Market of Turku (never heard of it until I saw in mentinoed in the above German Wikipedia article), so if that is not the case, feel free to remove the categorization, but in that case Commons and German Wikipedia may also need correction. cmadler (talk) 12:18, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

As the market is one of the largest summertime events in Finland, I would say that it meets the notability guideline for events and the template should be removed.[1] Aceman87 (talk) 17:16, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Turkulainen news article Retrieved 2017-02-05.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Medieval Market of Turku. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]