Talk:Maryland Route 36/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Section headers need to be capitalized correctly ("Route description"). The "See also" section is technically an unordered list, regardless of the number of items in the list (per WP:SEEALSO). MPH needs to be converted to km/hr using {{convert}}.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Does the Maryland State Highway Administration keep track of speed limits on state routes? MDRoads may not be a reliable source for FA purposes.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The junction list might makes the "Cities and towns" section obsolete. Review to see if it belongs, unless that's a project directive. The length should be stated somewhere in the article, preferably the intro.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Well written and quite interesting! Let me know when the changes are in. —Rob (talk) 04:26, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Passing after changes made. Thanks for the quick response!