Talk:Marston Mat

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Military history: Aviation / Technology / World War II C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	World War II task force

Name[edit]

I wonder what it was named after? --PeterMarkSmith 07:06, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where did the spelling MARSDEN come from? I've always seen it referenced as MARSTON. Wl7aml (talk) 07:54, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have the answer. Perhaps the town of Marston, North Carolina is pronounced with a soft 't' to make it sound like Marsden. Binksternet (talk) 14:30, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge[edit]

would seem to be logical to me to merge the topics. just picked up a piece from a creekbed in far NW of South Australia..has been used as sand mats for 4WD vehicles to un bog-themselves...Alex Hope 6/3/07203.173.55.46 03:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2008[edit]

Article reassessed and graded as start class. --dashiellx (talk) 16:24, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaced By…[edit]

I know these were replaced by some sort of polymer matting (the US Army was bragging about how easy they were to set up in some documentary about attack helicopters in Afghanistan, IIRC). Does anyone know anything about this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.209.39.113 (talk) 09:12, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pierced steel planking was largely replaced by a lighter-weight aluminum clone, but the engine heat of the new F-35B STOVL aircraft is too damned much for the aluminum stuff.[1] Steel planking should be making its comeback very shortly. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.251.135.52 (talk) 07:01, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To begin, PSP has never been replaced, last I checked...which is a while ago, granted. It's been supplemented, its primary function, general airfield paving, was already overtaken before WWII was over, but in the '80s and 90s it was still used for lighter surfacing, for protective structures, for vehicle hardstands, for pedestrian bridges, for light overhead cover, for...well, you get the idea. I saw a lot of it in Mr. Reagan's Army, and I was still taught how to use it, and its un-pierced descendants.

Fabric mats were mostly designed for dust and moisture control, not to spread the weight of vehicles. Sprayed surface treatments were often a simpler option for permanent sites where engine FOD ingestion wasn't an issue.

Something the article misses - later variants often weren't pierced, because the weight and drainage advantages of PSP were sometimes dwarfed by mowing requirements. Stuff grew through the holes, sometimes enough to interfere with operations. Anmccaff (talk) 05:18, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice piece on re-use in Italy[edit]

[Repurposed matting]

Yes, that should be added. Thanks for finding it. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:49, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing Date[edit]

The first (experimental) use of PSP was in 1942/1942 for constructing a 5,000 foot runway

This sentence is clearly wrong but which date is it? Louisfuture (talk) 14:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marston Mat. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]