Talk:Maritime power

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Maritime power article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maritime power. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:00, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Maritime power[edit]

@190.151.175.211: here you can talk about the problem. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 22:28, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakura emad: We only have the IP's word for what has been stated, I hope he/she has more proof to back up the claims being made plus expanding more on why information with good sources should be removed. Best StarryNightSky11^(talk) 22:37, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@StarryNightSky11 i told the IP regards to your opinion what else gives you the right to remove the well sourced information i hope he/she give us evidence to accept it. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 22:40, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@190.151.175.211 i am desperately waiting for you to give Editors (@StarryNightSky11, @CodeTalker @-Rdp060707) Proper Explanation with evidence, after seeing your Evidence it will be Accepted without needing to get involved in (Editing-warring)) —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 22:38, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakura emad: Hopefully, have to wait and see. StarryNightSky11^(talk) 22:42, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakura emad: The IP has been blocked for 72 hours, does that mean we close this discussion? StarryNightSky11^(talk) 23:56, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if we close it it can be reopened again right? @StarryNightSky11 —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 23:58, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Sakura emad: Yeah of course, we can wait 72 hours until the block expires and welcome the IP to participate again, and see if they can offer evidence for their edits, per above, and if they choose not to participate in the discussion we simply re-close and reinstate the removed content. StarryNightSky11^(talk) 00:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@StarryNightSky11 well then Please close the discussion. —— 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 00:04, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.