Talk:Marge in Chains/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Note: the sentence " As usual, the family hires Lionel Hutz to defend Marge at her trial" makes it sound like Marge has been to trial before, you might consider rephrasing it.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Why is the part about Karl French in the Cultural References section and not in the Reception section.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   It could use, maybe, one more image (perhaps one of Bill Oakley who wrote the episode)

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   If the above questions can be answered (wich, I suspect, won't take you very long) I will pass the article.--Music26/11 21:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for doing the GA review. Will work on addressing the above soon. Cirt (talk) 22:09, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

I believe I have addressed the points above and made changes to the article according to the recommendations from the GA reviewer. Cirt (talk) 03:18, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Passing. --Music26/11 16:25, 13 October 2008 (UTC)