Talk:Man Down (Holby City)/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 15:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 15:24, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Some Dude From North Carolina: Responded to all your comments below. Soaper1234 - talk 22:02, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

Don't use small font in the infobox per WP:SMALLFONT.
"who he" → "with who he"
Quotations need sources per WP:REF.
"The episodes serves" → "The episode serves"
Since its a type of camera, uses of Steadicam should be capitalized.
Is "benefitied" a typo or a British variant of the word?
"had walk" → "had walked"

All Done Soaper1234 - talk 21:01, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

Without the parenthetical names, the plot is at 491 words. Try getting it to 400 per MOS:TVPLOT.
"A flashbacks" → "A flashback" or "Flashbacks"
There appears to be a word missing in between "into hospital".

All Done Soaper1234 - talk 21:47, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Production[edit]

Remove the comma after "had been dropped".
"would featured" → "would be featured"
"portrayl" appears to be a typo.
"Holby City have" → "Holby City has"
"rather using the traditional steadicam" → "rather than using the traditional Steadicam"

All Done Soaper1234 - talk 21:49, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion and broadcast[edit]

"insits" → "insist"
Promotional material should list reactions to the content not just "[content] aired [date]" per WP:TRAILER.

All Done Soaper1234 - talk 21:58, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reception[edit]

This section looks good.

References and notes[edit]

In the notes, change "see [...]" to "As depicted in [...]" per consistency with other GA-articles (similar example).

Done Soaper1234 - talk 22:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Archive all archivable sources (either manually or with this tool).

Done prior to the review. Soaper1234 - talk 22:00, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress[edit]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·