Talk:MammaPrint

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article tone, references[edit]

The article used to have a rather unencyclopedic tone bordering on an advertisement. This includes the use of weasel words such as "well-known" to describe the Amsterdam 70-gene breast cancer gene signature, sales information such as coverage by US insurance schemes, and the repeated mention of other tests whose only connection to MammaPrint seems to be the common marketing. I have removed all that while adding links to relevant articles about the scientific background. The article also contained a vast list of scientific papers about the procedure, only one of which was actually linked to the article's content. If some of those papers explain in greater detail how MammaPrint works, such information could (and should, IMO) be contained in our article, with the relevant papers used as a source, but the pure list of papers is not helpful to readers. What the article instead needs is more references to actually source the content - I'm pretty sure none of the academic papers will contain information on the price, and the FDA link we once had was broken. The sampling technique may be detailed in some of those papers, but unless we can point the reader to the specific paper supporting that content, that's not really helpful. Huon (talk) 12:29, 1 July 2011 (UTC) All good points. And if I have time I will start a clean up of this article.FeatherPluma (talk) 05:35, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on MammaPrint. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]