Talk:Makhdoom Mohiuddin

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: History / Politics / Hyderabad Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hyderabad (assessed as Low-importance).

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Irrelevant Information[edit]

This is an Encyclopedic article and cannot contain information on what the person's grandchildren are doing! I guess this has escaped the wikipedia editors attention due to the low searches on the article. I have deleted most of the 'information'. I have left one section on his son pending citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Abhishekmathur (talk • contribs) 01:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Death dates

The dates of Mohiuddin's death in the text and in the panel differ by a month. Librarian16 (talk) 18:40, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Excessively unreferenced[edit]

Ninety percent of the claims made in this long article were unreferenced. I think the best thing is to strip it right back to, in essence, the lede, and allow that to serve as the article. Please don't add again without reliable and published third-party sources. Best regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:32, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]