Talk:Mae C. King

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women in Red: #1day1woman (2020)

This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tag[edit]

@DGG: please elaborate the cleanup tag, you have not made it clear what the issue is. - Astrophobe (talk) 04:17, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only tagged it with the lowest level cleanup tag, for it is easily fixable; there are worse, to be tagged as advertisements, and much worse, to be draftified. I recognize that you are a good faith editor, not the sort of academic press agent who write the majority of the submitted articles on academics. The people you are writing about are notable., and the articles are definitely needed in Wikipedia. I want to encourage you, not discourage you.

Even good faith editors often write in a somewhat promotional style, partly because they copy the style of the hundreds of thousands of promotional articles in Wikipedia that we need to fix or remove, and partly so much of the writing in the whole world is written in a promotional style. Encyclopedias should be different.

Press releases on academics characteristically use terms of praise, are not precise about the persons exact positions, give incomplete citations of the person's work, use cherry-picked quotations from book reviews, frequently repeat the person's name,

Encyclopedic bios of academics contains the full sequence of degrees and positions with dates, they(usually) include the name of the doctoral advisor and the title of the thesis, a complete list of books published, with year, date, publisher and ISBN (referenced to WorldCat) and the most cited peer-reviewed articles, given in full with coauthors, full name of journals, and links, with the number of citations to each of them from Google Scholar or Scopus or SCI. They include national level awards- and include significant honors such as editor in chief of a journal or president of a major organization, while omitting minor ones such as service on an editorial board or membership in an organization. They preferably use book reviews by making references to them, not including them in the text, --we have a device for significant quotation in the quote= parameter of cite book,

These problems affect all of your bios, if viewing the people as academics. It's true that articles on people who are primarily activists are typically much less specific, if that's the main notability and any academic work is incidental.

I'll be glad to look again fter you've improved them. They deserve proper articles that woill not be confused with promotionalism . DGG ( talk ) 23:28, 16 March 2020 (UTC) .[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Political Science Research Methods POLS 2399[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2024 and 1 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MyaW27 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Nikkidong9, Eliza Greenberg, Youjustgotmurpht.

— Assignment last updated by Krodinehardy (talk) 17:08, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]