Talk:MIL-STD-1760

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Refer to the MIL-STD-1553 entry for details on the lower-level protocol. NOTE - Need more here on the higher-level 1760 protocols used to define the usage of data words in the 1553 messages.

— Preceding text originally posted on MIL-STD-1760 (diff) by 65.91.2.68 (talkcontribs) 15:20, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MIL-STD 1553 - Dual-redundant? In many cases this is true, but it isn't ALWAYS true. it is acceptable to have a non-redunant mil-std 1553 bus... there are even cases of triply-redundant (or more) 1553 buses. It is true that dual-redundant is by far the most common configuration, but it isn't the only one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.130.194.247 (talk) 01:44, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on MIL-STD-1760. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:05, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]