Talk:MG XPower SV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Class Supercar[edit]

Its not a supercar. It was never in full production so its a prototype or concept. Furthermore, even if it were in production it still would not be a supercar. A supercar is more than just looks and performance. It has to be made by a supercar maker, ie: Ferrari, Lamborghini, Porsche, etc. Vaccari & Bosi and MG Rover are not supercar makers and never have been, even if it is based on Qvale Mangusta, as that is not a supercar either, only the name name Mangusta comes from old De Tomaso Mangusta, it was not made by De Tomaso. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.19.157.52 (talk) 16:21, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above is not exactly a water-tight argument for what is and isn't a supercar. Koenigsegg and Pagani both definatley supercars but have very little pedigree behind them. MG, however, have a LeMans racing history. LewisR (talk) 22:52, 11 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It was made in Italy by people who didn't work for MG Rover, it was available with anywhere up to 1000 bhp, and it was made in extremely small numbers. This car meets every possible definition of supercar and the small production numbers and high price act in support of that status rather than against it. The stratospherically high price tag of 150 grand was 10 grand more than the MSRP of the Ford GT, which is by any definition a supercar.

Who died (besides their Nazi benefactors) and made Porsche a supercar maker? They started out making tractors and modified Volkswagen Beetles, their styling department was axed 40 years ago, and they now make an overpriced roadster, and a hideous off-roader. Chaparral2J (talk) 07:03, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't much like the looks of those cars myself, but can we stay away from homophobic comments, please? For what it's worth, I think "supercar" is such a vague term anyway that we're better off avoiding it altogether - except, of course, where a source has used the term themselves. Loganberry (Talk) 23:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status of pictures in this article[edit]

The three pictures in this article are not copyright. They were taken by me on my Nokia 6680 camera phone on 07/05/2006 and uploaded to Wikipedia with the 'I the creator release into the public domain' copyright tag. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Violentbob (talkcontribs) 14:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Looks like a VZ commodore —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.198.171 (talk) 09:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal[edit]

Most of the MG X-Power WR article actually covers the SV and hence duplicates this article. I suggest the WR could and should be covered in this article. Letdorf (talk) 13:03, 24 July 2009 (UTC).[reply]

Since there have been no objections, I've now done this. Letdorf (talk) 20:44, 4 January 2010 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on MG XPower SV. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MG XPower SV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]