Talk:Lucifer Rising (book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Religion: Left Hand Path

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Left Hand Path work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Untitled[edit]

Removed a book review which had been copied and pasted from Amazon (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0859652807/002-6099530-2113648?v=glance&n=283155 - review by Draconis Blackthorne) and replaced it with a stub.

The original article did not strike me as suitable for an encyclopedia, being as it was adulatory, rambling and openly insulting towards certain parties.

Laserbream 16:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC) (timestamp inaccurate, signature added weeks later as I did not know about signing comments when I edited the article)[reply]

I find it interesting, and sad that the wikipedia articles on John Conner and The Resistance Manifesto have been deleated from the database, but this article is important enough to keep? Advertising a book supporting satanism is ok, but a book exposing satanism gets removed? Sad, very sad.

Laserbream 12:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC) I am not sure who John Conner is, but since I found and cleaned up the article on Lucifer Rising, I'm pretty sure that it no longer qualifies as advertising. The previous entry might have been construed as such, but I'm hoping that it is now what it should be - a factual, albeit minor entry on a book.[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 13:41, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Luciferrising.jpg[edit]

Image:Luciferrising.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]