Talk:Lubberts effect

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 09:59, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 27 April 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 19:11, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lubbert's effect → Lubberts effect – The effect is named for Dr. G. Lubberts, not Lubbert. Most medical sources use "Lubberts effect" with no apostrophe. SimLibrarian (talk) 21:13, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Dicklyon: who moved it from Lubberts effect to the current possessive form. DMacks (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Unquestionably should be moved back. Probably doesn't even really need an RFM to do it. PianoDan (talk) 16:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nominator, the doctor is named Lubberts, not Lubbert. JIP | Talk 00:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support It shouldn't have been moved in the first place. XOR'easter (talk) 20:33, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.