Talk:Lord President of Munster

Ireland Low‑importance

	Ireland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

Re changes to the period after 1603: the chronology seems in question, with several different versions in the literature. Henry Brouncker may have only been President 1603-4. I know nothing about Henry Becher's role. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one reference: [1], letter to "Henry Bronkar", May 1604, as President. Charles Matthews (talk) 21:56, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Another, "Henry Brunker" in August 1604 issues a proclamation. Robert Dunlop, Ireland Under the Commonwealth, p. xlv. Charles Matthews (talk) 22:01, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that Henry Becher or Beecher had William Lyon (bishop) as father-in-law, having married his daughter Mary, and resided at Castlemahon. Charles Matthews (talk) 22:29, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See on Becher [2] and various other pieces of original research on the Web. It seems likely to me that Becher had plenty of local recognition as a military leader, but no status in the eyes of London. There is further Pollard's suggestion that Thomond took over from 1605. More likely Brouncker had the nominal title, but had made such a bad job of the position that he had little power on the ground. The article should reflect the reliable sources, naturally. Charles Matthews (talk) 22:52, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]