Talk:London Underground strikes

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2022. The result of the discussion was keep.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Transport Mid‑importance

	London transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Transport in London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.London TransportWikipedia:WikiProject London TransportTemplate:WikiProject London TransportLondon Transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Picture[edit]

It would be helpful to have a picture, either of the disruption caused or the picket of workers on strike — Preceding unsigned comment added by Absolutelypuremilk (talk • contribs) 20:14, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled 2016 comment[edit]

This is a very misleading article - totally out of date, missing the 2015 main strike for example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.41.117 (talk) 17:48, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Missing London Tube Strike 2015[edit]

There are missing tube strikes for this discussion. There are likely more, but off the top of my head the 2015 strike is not listed. SmashnGrab (talk) 23:55, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of London Underground strikes[edit]

The article London Underground strikes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Out of date and misleading article, unlikely to be resolvable as clearly no interest by editors

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andymmu^talk 13:13, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Andymmu I have now formally proposed it - it's very outdated, and anything useful could be merged into the main articles. Turini2 (talk) 11:39, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GB fan Ah, thanks - no one made a comment against it here, so - I'll go down the AFD route Turini2 (talk) 14:22, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Still very poor article, why hasn't it been deleted yet? Ianmurray5 (talk) 11:53, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Very strange article[edit]

Talks of strikes as being this constant, "intermittent" issue, but the dates in the table at the bottom seem to cluster around two specific time frames. 2A02:A210:20BA:D500:0:0:0:100B (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]