Talk:Lockheed XC-35

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Historical Significance[edit]

I found constant references to the Boeing 307 as being the first commercial aircraft with pressurization (a true statement) however there is surprisingly little information on this aircraft, which to my knowledge was the first pressurized aircraft of any type. Does anybody know of an earlier aircraft with pressurization? Ratsbew (talk) 20:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

    • There is a short and rather error strewn piece in Jane's AWA 1938 about it. They don't say it's unique, explicitly, but describe it without reference to any obvious predecessor or equivalent.TSRL (talk) 20:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The claim here is that the XC-35 was the first pressurised aircraft, but is that right? Its first flight was 19370509, but the Junkers Ju 49 first flew 19321101, nearly 5 years earlier. By the summer of 1934 this aircraft was flying with its cabin pressurised at altitudes higher than the XC-35s ceiling.TSRL (talk) 19:45, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Modified article to include this information. Thanks for pointing out the discrepancy.Ratsbew (talk) 23:14, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you follow the link to the entry for the Ju-49 you'll see that this article still must be wrong - according to that, the Ju-49 was only the second working pressurized aircraft, while an American built DH.9A was the first one, worldwide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.106.103 (talk) 16:09, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lockheed XC-35. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:06, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Lockheed XC-35. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]