Talk:Liverpool F.C. 4–3 Newcastle United F.C. (1996)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleLiverpool F.C. 4–3 Newcastle United F.C. (1996) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2012Good article nomineeListed

Disambiguation by date[edit]

This article needs to be disambiguated by date, because there has been more than one 4-3 scoreline between Liverpool and Newcastle. Jmorrison230582 (talk) 18:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are right there. 12 months after the initial game, Liverpool and Newcastle faced off again. At half time, Liverpool lead 3-0, but in the 88th minute, Newcastle had levelled it to 3-3. Unfortunately, it was a Robbie Fowler header in the final minute that cancelled out a great comeback, ending the game 4-3, Liverpool's way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.220.87.193 (talk) 12:34, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Liverpool F.C. 4–3 Newcastle United F.C. (1996). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]