Talk:List of works by Edwin Lutyens

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cemeteries[edit]

Should this article include the cemeteries designed by Lutyens? Étaples Military Cemetery is one example. There are many others as well. Not sure how these are best covered. @Tagishsimon: what do you think? Carcharoth (talk) 19:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, very much so, Carcharoth. My views: 1) all his works qualify - including furniture, if we have good-enough ref 2) Lutyens is ill-served by wikipedia right now and 3) this list article was, I think, 4 items long when I found it. I've shovelled some more information into it, but it begs for more thought and attention, and is most definitely in a plastic state. Which is to say, please improve it in whatever ways occur to you without concern that there are a hundred watchlists waiting to tell you you did wrong.

There might be a bit of thought to be given, now, or later, to the table structure. I've divided tables by country; others might want to divide by type of work, or have a single table so that they can choose how to order it. (It occurs to me as I write this ... I wanted to get rid of Country as a column for space reasons; but I could cope with a country column using two-letter abbreviations.)

Finally, if it is not already clear, I'd be delighted to see some input on this list. I've kinda wandered away in the direction of Women in Red and wikidata right now. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 19:52, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I might not have much time either, but HJ Mitchell might have time to help. There are items in the categories not yet on the list. That would be a good expansion point. Carcharoth (talk) 19:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! Time! I work nights, which is why I appear to be about in the day but I'm usually asleep all afternoon. It's taken me nearly a year just to turn of all his public war memorials in Britain into blue links and the half a dozen or so that were already blue are still in a sorry state (Manchester Cenotaph, for example, completely misses its significance). There are still major war memorials in central London that don't have articles. The cemeteries are one of those things I've been planning to get to "at some point". And people say Wikipedia's finished! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:01, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of works by Edwin Lutyens. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160915165906/http://www.stjameschurchabinger.org/War-Memorial.ashx to http://www.stjameschurchabinger.org/War-Memorial.ashx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

York House, 292 Hills Road, Cambridge[edit]

Do any editors have further information on this house, the last in the list of Houses and Gardens? It was added by IP 165.225.72.59 on 29 October 2016. Looking to knock off the remaining red links, I've done some digging and there appears some debate as to whether it actually is Lutyens. The source seems clear that the house was undertaken to his designs. The owner, Ridgeon, was a major builder, so perhaps Lutyens just did drawings? But it isn't listed. That seems implausible, although not impossible (I know of a William Burges church that was not listed until last year). I can't see it in the revised Cambridgeshire Pevsner, although I could have missed it as the entry for Hills Road is quite long. Lastly, it seems to be threatened by demolition, [1], [2], [3], or perhaps has by now been demolished. [It's still standing on Google Earth - CB20QG but I don't know when that was taken.] It would seem improbable that HE would not take a view on the demolition of a Lutyens building. Any information would be extremely helpful. Shall also post on the Architecture Project page. KJP1 (talk) 13:35, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now heard back from the Lutyens Trust who say: "The Lutyens Trust has previously looked into the attribution of this house to Lutyens and concluded that it is not by him". They think it's a Crooksbury copy. So I shall take it out. KJP1 (talk) 14:58, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are the Lutyens Trust saying that York House is a copy of Crooksbury House in Farnham?[4] It doesn't look much like it. It seems that Lutyens himself copied Crooksbury House in the design of Fig Tree Court nearby.[5] Several of Luytens houses are very similar (which reminds me on the quip that Haydn wrote the same symphony 100 times). Maybe another architect designed York House following some of Lutyens' designs. I can't York House find it in the 1970 Pevesner. The Cambridge Collection source[6] cites the Cambridge News, which while citable is not a top-quality source. I support your removal of the entry. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:46, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder if the similarity was closer to the original Crooksbury, which the LT describes as new-Georgian, before Ned went back to dress it up in the Surrey vernacular? You’re quite right, it isn’t in the original Pevsner, nor in the 2012 revised. Nor is it listed, which is close to inconceivable for a Lutyens house. Lastly, it isn’t referenced in any of the Lutyens works I’ve read - which is most of them. That is not impossible, as his output was prolific, but it is another reason for scepticism. There was an almighty row when it was threatened with demolition, which may subsequently have occurred and, for obvious reasons, its defenders pushed the Lutyens connection. I suspect (OR) it is one of those cases where local newspapers etc., then picked up the Lutyens mention and repeated it as fact. As, I also suspect, did the IP who added it in 2016. All in all, I just don’t think there’s sufficient RS to include it in the list and I’m glad you agree. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 18:05, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. - I actually think Crooksbury and Fig Tree Court are parts of the same house. KJP1 (talk) 18:11, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Millmead House, Bramley, Surrey[edit]

needs adding