This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Horticulture and Gardening on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Horticulture and GardeningWikipedia:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningTemplate:WikiProject Horticulture and GardeningHorticulture and gardening articles
I think as is, it should be merged with Shade tolerance, but maybe one should consider renaming it as a list of shade-tolerant and -intolerant species? I think it would be a good addition to the realm of trees, perhaps grouped by continent? I could get started on it in a couple weeks. minnecologies (talk) 15:45, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is a "List of shade-tolerant species". Should there really be two sections about "Shade intolerant" species? I'm going ahead, removing them. Punkmorten (talk) 18:42, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I've thought about it that before but have never got around to it, the page should be renamed and the content remain. Minnecologies (talk) 19:39, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]