Talk:List of paintings by Rembrandt

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Netherlands

This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The Holy Family at Night[edit]

I do not see the painting 'The Holy Family at Night' on this Article. Am I just not seeing it? (I searched a quick find too!) Here it is if anyone's wondering: http://www.wikipaintings.org/en/rembrandt/the-holy-family-night Newyorkadam (talk) 23:53, 17 October 2013 (UTC)Newyorkadam[reply]

Portrait of an Old Man in an Armchair[edit]

The painting you call "Portrait of an Old Man in an Armchair" is called "Portrait of a Jew" by the Hermitage, who own it. Why is another title being used here? Intelligent Mr Toad (talk) 15:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Omitted work[edit]

I've run across some works attributed to Rembrandt that aren't listed here, such as File:Rembrandt Harmensz van Rijn - Scholar at his Study - Google Art Project.jpg (right) from The National Gallery in Prague. Is this not widely accepted as a Rembrandt, or is something else going on? Thanks! Dcoetzee 15:38, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

61018Margaretha de Geer.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:20, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Lady and Gentleman in Black[edit]

Does anyone have access to the most recent catalog of works from the Rembrandt Research Project? Supposedly they pulled A Lady and Gentleman in Black in 1987 per some news reports, but I'm seeing it listed here. Was it re-added to their catalog? Thank you TarkusAB^talk/contrib 15:36, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@TarkusAB:, it turns out the painting was dis-attributed at one point, but the RRP attributed it to Rembrandt again, as #61, in the most recent catalog. The painting's article, linked from this list, is half-right, as it doesn't explain the most recent RRP finding. Outriggr (talk) 02:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Outriggr: OK thanks. The painting article was correct until I modified it today. I will fix. TarkusAB^talk/contrib 03:37, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Catalogue numbers: why these?[edit]

Apparently the author(s) of this page have decided to follow the numbering system of the Rembrandt Research Project's "Corpus of Rembrandt Paintings". This leads to bizarre effects in the chronology, like a painting signed and dated 1631 coming at the end of 1632, then being followed by paintings from 1638, then back again. When I consult this list, I am interested in the chronology, not in the erratic numbering system of the RRP. The inclusion or omission of certain works is a matter of debate, but sticking to chronology, even if approximate ("c. 1631") should be rule number one. To mention two works I know very well, A85 and A86 definitely belong at the end of the year 1631 rather than at the end of 1632, which is misleading. Jan van der Zone 10:06, 7 March 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan van der Zone (talk • contribs)