Talk:List of Serbian films

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Cooperate[edit]

Santasa99 (talk · contribs) It would be helpful if you would listen to other editors and engage on the TP, for a change. Some of the movies you have removed - should be removed, others - not so much. Engage on the TP first and now undo yourself and let's examine your rationale and what makes sense. For example "Valter" should not be in the list. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 02:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Not one of these films belong to this list as they are all described as Yugoslav films and included into List of Yugoslav films. Even if you can find some Serbian website claiming them for "Serbian heritage" exclusively (which would be a cultural appropriation, quite common for societies plunged into nationalism), you will not be able to find one relevant international cinematographic organization or institute or database that doesn't consider them Yugoslav films. Some television production could be included, which is the reason I didn't want to remove coding, but only that by RTV houses from Serbia/Vojvodina/Kosovo.--౪ Santa ౪99° 03:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, once again, copy titles of the movies which you want to remove and let's see which are ready for removal. Do not push your POV if other editors go with undo. For example, Balakanski špijun should be kept.Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 13:39, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sadko, this is not an argument - it's up to editors to prove that film(s) belong to the List by providing refed evidence or at least that it is described as such by film's respective article with good refs included, of course; these films are ALL Yugoslav production, and listed as Yugoslav in that country's List. You are engaging in slow-moving edit wars too often, and all too often you are trying to cheat by sneaking challenged info into articles after changing its scope, which you are inventing all by yourself as you feel fit or as you need at the moment your inclusions gets challenged.--౪ Santa ౪99° 03:07, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That is basically correct, as it is correct that 2 editors went with undo and invited you to use the TP, with good faith and collaboration in mind, you went full WP:STONEWALL, pointing fingers and behaved uncivilly. After this weird accusations "of changing scope", which was done in good faith, you my fellow editor, went to another page about Serbian art and changed the scope of that article yourself. That sort of behaviour is not constructive in my mind and neither are these toxic diffs (often followed with several !), frequent comments and accusations of multiple editors of "following me around" etc. It has all been noted.
The thing is, I did ask you nicely and I even agreed with the nature of the move, but you choose to be stubborn and not work with other editors, which was the same case several months ago, on several Croatian history pages which led to your permanent ban being on the table. I am a tolerant person, but if this sort of approach and behaviour continues on other related topics, a fundamentally different approach and real actions will be taken. Recent massive removal on related lists will be also be reexamined as I am now starting to have doubts about them. Take care and happy working with other editors. Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 01:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]