Talk:List of Playboy Playmates of 2013

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 August 2021. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of Playboy Playmates of 2013 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 30 November 2012 by reviewer DanS76 (talk · contribs).

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

2010s Low‑importance

	2010s portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Wow wow wobbzy[edit]

2013 is gonna be a fabulous year. My favorite's Kristen Nicole. Wow... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.118.157.163 (talk) 15:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal balls and gratuitous "references"?[edit]

Among the Wikipedia guidelines I read, is a direction that these pages are not to be used as "crystal balls", i.e. for announcing what is going to happen before it actually occurs. How does that square with the practice of some contributors to these lists of Playboy Playmates, who seem eager to be the first to announce who is going to be Playmate for an upcoming month? It may well be that some people do have "inside info", and they and the info may be pretty reliable. But the fact is, nobody knows with 100% certainty until the magazine is printed and shipped. Changes have occurred from what was announced in the previous issue. Shouldn't we cool our jets and just let these pages reflect what IS and not what we are pretty sure is about to be?

Also, I appreciate peoples' dedication to proper documentation, but I wonder at some of the references cited. Why credit any particular blog or wiki as a reference for what nobody, including them, knows with certainty until that particular issue of PLAYBOY magazine ships, whereupon *everyone* knows it? The ultimate source of the info, if anyone feels an urge to cite a reference, is that issue of the magazine. The source is not any blog or wiki, no matter how well-informed they may be, nor how far in advance of the issue's publication it was that they correctly guessed who the Playmate would be. Wikilister (talk) 06:34, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Crystal Balls versus Crystal Harris[edit]

you are right but if you visit www.playboy.com you'll find out who's gonna win.You can even vote for your favorite playmate on playboy.com.About Wikipedia,everyone knows wiki editors react too late to breaking news.That's why some write about latest info on talk pages.Personally, that's a good idea to write something new about article before anyone else.That doesn't hurt anyone.Editors later can edit the article and delete the comments.By the way, playboy mansion hasn't any Crystal Balls , the mansion has Crystal Harris. ;-) just kiddin 5.116.35.90 (talk) 09:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links in the Playboy Lists[edit]

There has been recent action to delete external links to the Playboy Wiki in these lists. If you are interested, either for or against, there is a discussion about it here: Noticeboard for External links. Wikilister (talk) 13:14, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And the consensus was to delete them. I've gone ahead and removed them once again. --Ronz (talk) 18:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

archived version of discussion linked above archived discussion on Twitter, etc links --Ronz (talk) 19:06, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of Playboy Playmates of 2013. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eonline.com/news/542375/kennedy-summers-named-playboy-s-2014-playmate-of-the-year-meet-the-sexy-star

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]