Talk:List of Latin phrases (H)

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Additional phrase: "Horae Canonicae"[edit]

The Wikipedia reference is the literal translation. The more idiomatic meaning is the English "high time". May I add this? Old_Wombat (talk) 11:32, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hic Rhodos, hic salta?[edit]

"Hic Rhodos, hic salta" is missing --2001:A62:1927:B901:14A0:F9ED:7044:39A5 (talk) 21:35, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

homo homini lupus[edit]

homo homini lupus - man [is a] wolf to man

The entry for this sentence states

First attested in Plautus' Asinaria (lupus est homo homini). 
The sentence was drawn on by Hobbes in Leviathan as a concise expression of his views on human nature.

I searched the text of Leviathan (wikisource) but couldn't find this sentence.

This article (Homo homini lupus) says that Thomas Hobbes drew upon the proverb in his De Cive (writing in the dedication ...)

That is true. Hobbes wrote in his dedication

That Man to Man is a kind of God; and that Man to Man is an arrant. Wolfe.

But why does the entry of this list mention the Leviathan as source of the sentence? 2003:CF:3F0A:8AE3:887B:5AA2:9758:F9AA (talk) 16:39, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What you write is indeed described in the article homo homini lupus. I corrected it here now. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 01:45, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]