Talk:List of Gakuen Alice characters

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

New article[edit]

No point in making a new article... merge it or delete this... and this requires a cleanup...


203.131.88.238 01:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dont you thinkit's rather ver confusing and it really requires a much lesser spoiler page!


It's too large now to be merged with its parent article, let it stay here. Pathbinder 02:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alice[edit]

Misaki's alice is doppelganger. I actually found out that a doppelganger is a ghostly double of a person that haunts its flesh counterpart. This is just my opinion, but I think that Misaki's doubles are sort of...weird. Can you tell me what you think?68.110.232.148 23:07, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

She seems to have control over her doubles. They don't really haunt her. --Squilibob 10:09, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In episode number 23 of the anime, Narumi is talking about a person with the same nullification alice as Mikan. He says that the person criticized the academy. The person that he is talking about seems to be that person, who is later revealed to be Mikan's mom, but Mikan's mom had the alice stealing alice according to the manga, so that doesn't make much sense. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.68.72.88 (talk) 02:03, August 26, 2007 (UTC) Misaki's alice is probably closer to 'clone'. And RE nullification alice...(*spoiler alert*) he's probably talking about her dad. :P Close enough, both of those people are probably known as 'that person' anyway..--58.106.220.142 (talk) 12:16, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alice Stones???[edit]

Excuse me, but are there any such things as Alice stones? Whoever put that there I need proof before you can put it up. Please give me proof, and you can put them back up. If vadalism is the case, I will put up a warning.Nightflower 23:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've just found out (by reading english translated manga translations) that there are indeed Alice Stones. Sorry for the bother. You don't need to confirm this, but you do need to confirm the Luna thing.Nightflower 14:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New characters???[edit]

Um, excuse me, but I'm here gain and I want to know if Luna and the other characters are from the manga because I've never heard of them. Again, I need proof. Thank you very much.Nightflower 23:45, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hrmm... I've only seen the anime and don't know much about the manga. Taking a quick peek at the Japanese Wikipedia, though, there seems to be a character named 小泉月 Koizumi Runa listed (since that's the kanji for moon, maybe "Luna" is the correct romanization). --EmperorBrandon 03:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I've read the manga up to Volume 9 (it hasn't been translated yet). There is no sign of Luna yet, so please confirm this by having a link or manga book.Nightflower 14:32, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. I finally found a site that translates the manga. Here's the link about Luna if anybody wants to know. There is also proof about Alice Stones there. Nightflower 17:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Luna is indeed in the manga. She appears in the recent chapters of the manga. Here's a site that offers translated chapters of the manga. Samantha Lim88 01:31, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Cleanup?[edit]

Can someone help to cleanup the article?

Samantha Lim88 01:16, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Keep Posting[edit]

I think people should keep posting so please post more!

Nevermind567 09:22, 12 July 2007

Differentiate between manga and anime characters[edit]

somebody should put up if the characters specified here appeared on the anime, manga or both...

PBCNX 14:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well in animes,its always like that.They do not even join the other characters in the anime.I was really also confused,I always ask to myself "cnu b yan?"because of the characters that only can be seen on manga! T^T

FinexShade 19:31, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Erase?[edit]

In the information about the robot,Takahashi, there isn't much about it. I think either people should delete it or add more information.

Nevermind567 04:30 pm, 13 July 2007

Tonouchi Akiyoshi? Tonouchi Akira?[edit]

There's a confusion between the names? I went to the Japanese Wiki and saw the katakana given. I also went here to translate it. I know it's unreliable, but then I requested my sister to check again the katakana using her kanji dictionary. It's Tonouchi Akira and not Tonouchi Akiyoshi. Okay, here's the katakana: とのうち あきら

Anyone who would like to give me your opinion regarding this matter, reply at my talk page.

Thanks,
Samantha Lim88


But if it was "Tonouchi Akiyoshi" it wouldn't be 明良 isn't it. But I checked the Japanese Wiki too, and I can read katakana, and it is indeed "Tonouchi Akira", which is wierd, because usually Akira is read as 明. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.82.155.34 (talk) 14:02, August 22, 2007 (UTC)

Wrong image of Aoi[edit]

Someone has just placed an image of Nobara Ibaragi as Aoi Hyūga. Can someone remove this picture as I already have placed a picture of Nobara.

Thank you,
Samantha Lim88 02:00, 16 August 2007 (UTC)


Kokoroyomi or Yome Kokoro?[edit]

Can anybody tell me if it is Kokoroyomi or Yome Kokoro? if it is Kokoroyomi then please would someone separate his first name with his last?

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.163.208.49 (talk) 09:35, August 25, 2007 (UTC)

I checked the Japanese Wiki and it is stated as just "Kokoroyomi".
Thank you,
Samantha Lim88 02:58, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

On character spoilers[edit]

This page has too much spoilers on the characters. Perhaps a spoiler alert on the top of the page would be enough to warn any new fans. (I don't know how to do that though.) Angie sash 11:17, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merging of individual character articles[edit]

The individual character articles that have been created off of this article should be merged back in. They fail WP:FICT, establish no real-world notability to support being separate, and are likely to be deleted if editors are not proactive about going ahead and taking care of the issues. So far, I've only tagged one for merging, but would really like a discussion on merging all of them in.

I'd also like to suggest this page's list be pared down to remove the minor characters who play only bit parts in the series and have no real notability or significant influence to the anime or manga series as a whole. I'm not particularly familiar with this series, but from a quick scan it looks like most of the characters in the "Miscellaneous" section are minor characters that don't need to be included. AnmaFinotera (talk) 09:36, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The character plays a significant role in the series and is one of the major character. He is a part of the faculty and staff, not listed under Miscellaneous and the character has a major interaction with the main character. The page "Narumi" should not be merged. It is assured the more information about him will come. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.57.38 (talk) 03:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
None of the individual characters pass the notability criteria on an individual bases. They also contain an excessive amount of plot detail with violates WP:NOT#PLOT and needs to be trimmed down significently. Characters don't receive individual article because they play a significant role in the plot, instead, they get individual articles if they are proven to be notable by being covered by reliable third-party sources. I have tagged them all for merger into the list article. --Farix (Talk) 18:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, none of these article meet the notability criteria. I completely support this merge. --Kraftlos (talk) 08:14, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


"Narumi" is a common Japanese surname and given name. And it's also a geographic name in Japan. I don't think it's appropriate to use "Narumi" for just one character. So it should be merged or moved. Asience (talk) 06:56, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge for reasons stated above. It's now been over a year since this proposal was made; I suggest that the merge should go ahead. Bry9000 (talk) 01:27, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per above, no one as even bothered to keep the the main list up to date with the individuals articles which have been unevenly kept up to date. The style of those updates more blog like. The whooping ratio between size of the article and the size of the inserted images in those individuals articles (Natsume Hyūga : 18KB article, 660KB images), Wikipedia bandwidth thanks you. --KrebMarkt 19:23, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge. I'm going to go ahead and merge one or two of em. Drmies (talk) 15:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Matsudaira Hayate instead of Matsudaichi Hayate[edit]

Gonna make the edit for Hayate, who is a side character appearing in the manga. I don't know why it was Matsudaichi in the first place..I'm looking at the furigana for his name in the character profile (Profile34, page 7 of volume 11 chapter 62) and it definitely looks like a ra and not a chi, which has an extra connected stroke across at the top.

Checking up Jim Breen's dictionary also gives me "松平 【まつだいら】 Matsudaira (p,s) 【まつへい】 Matsuhei (s) 【しょうへい】 Shouhei (s,g) 【まつたいら】 Matsutaira (s) 【まつひら】 Matsuhira (s)", but no Matsudaichi. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.5.62 (talk) 14:35, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: Also, Japanese wiki gives it as Matsudaira. (http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%AD%A6%E5%9C%92%E3%82%A2%E3%83%AA%E3%82%B9) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.239.5.62 (talk) 14:39, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding editing[edit]

I was surprised to find out that character profile of the protagonist was deleted. I've already placed it back with the reference. In Natsume Hyuuga's article, someone actually placed "I wish there was a kissing scene between Natsume and Mikan in the anime" or something similar to that. I had edited it already. But lately, I've seen some careless editing in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.57.38 (talk) 16:27, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree on that. I also found many spelling mistakes on this article. I cannot believe someone spelt 'temporarily' wrong, unless if the editor was in grade 5. If anyone doesn't know how to spell a word, or unsure of the spelling, CHECK THE DICTIONARY!! >_< Spongalicious (talk) 12:01, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]