Talk:List of Daria characters

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Animation: American Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Tricia Gupty was present[edit]

In episode 406 (I Loathe a Parade) Tricia Gupty was with her parents when they and Tad were reunited. I don't recall if she had a spoken line or not; however, it is incorrect to say that she did not appear. - Necessary Truths, 27 Oct 2006

Barksdale merges[edit]

I really don't think that a few lines about characters that show up in <= 3 episodes really warrant their own articles. Propose Merge & Redirect. -- RevRagnarok ^{Talk Contrib Reverts} 10:38, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Guy Fawkes Day[edit]

I'm not sure, but didn't Guy Fawkes Day look like Sid Vicious, a punk icon and the "bassist" of the Sex Pistols..?

if yes, then this should be added

Proposed mergers[edit]

A number of mergers have been proposed, but, as far as I can see, nobody has offered their rationale for those mergers. I would be happy to discuss them if someone who is pro-merging wanted to present such a case here. I want to make two affirmative points while I'm here, however.. First, I think that each family member, Jane Lane, and Trent Lane, at the very least, should have independent articles. Second, if and when articles on minor characters are merged into this one, all of the content at the original articles should be preserved, at least at first. Then, at that point, we can whittle away the stuff that's superfluous. Croctotheface 09:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Format quirk[edit]

The Three Js are covered twice. I'm sure this is only a transient error, but I don't have time to fix it right now. If someone else spots it before I can get back, go ahead and fix it; I suggest that the lower version is more consistent with the article's overall format. Wyvern 19:58, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've fixed it. I think I've combined everything worthwhile from both entries and formatted everything usefully. The upper version was longer and more detailed, the lower in a better position; between the two, little more than cut and paste needed to be done. Comment and upgrade if you see anything to be done. Wyvern 09:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed revision[edit]

It seems to me that the Fashion Club should be listed under Lawndale High Students, rather than off by itself, probably as the very next subheading after General Populace (as they get more screen time than the football team). This would be an easy change to make, but since it would be a noticable revision of the page layout I'm going to bring up the idea here before doing it, so that other interested people can chime in on it.

Also, is there any reason we haven't put more of the notable characters in subheadings? You'd think Jane at least should appear on the contents list!

Give comments, please. Wyvern 10:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think both of your suggestions are fine. Go for it. Croctotheface 10:13, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Quinns guys.jpg[edit]

Image:Quinns guys.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:52, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Orange Square.gif[edit]

Image:Orange Square.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Yellow Square.gif[edit]

Image:Yellow Square.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 03:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jake1.gif[edit]

Image:Jake1.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images removed[edit]

Per Wikipedia:NFC#Non-free_image_use_in_list_articles, the fair use images in this article have been removed. The use of per-character images on character lists such as this is not permitted by policy at WP:NFCC or guideline. Furthermore, there are cast pictures available, such as Image:Lane Family Chaos.jpg (though that image will be deleted by this Friday if not used) and Image:Dariatitle.jpg. Cast images are far, far preferable over single character images, per guideline. Please do not simply revert the removals. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:40, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Who played Ms Li[edit]

It states that MS Li's voice actor was on Who wants to be a Millionair and also states that she did an impersonation on it. However it does not state who she is voiced by. Anyone have any ideas? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.34.231.232 (talk) 16:37, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nora Laudani. ----DanTD (talk) 16:42, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Jane Lane (Daria), Quinn Morgendorffer, Helen Morgendorffer, Jake Morgendorffer, and Trent Lane[edit]

The majority of the characters in this media franchise are not sufficiently individually notable to justify their own articles. As such, the following articles should be merged here: Jane Lane (Daria), Quinn Morgendorffer, Helen Morgendorffer, Jake Morgendorffer, and Trent Lane. Neelix (talk) 01:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And you decided this how? They're primary characters, for crying out loud. ----DanTD (talk) 09:31, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A "primary" character ought at least to appear in nearly every episode, and Trent doesn't, iirc. And that's not enough; I'd say the parents are "major supporting" rather than primary. —Tamfang (talk) 21:19, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lawndale's Coach[edit]

Who is Lawndale High's Coach? She is the one that snuck Cheerleading practice into Gym class and demanded that Jane stay in Track. No information about her is in the Faculty section. In-Correct (talk) 15:32, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Jodie Landon into List of Daria characters[edit]

No consensus to merge Polyamorph (talk) 07:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

There is insufficient independent notability for a standalone article. This title should redirect to List of Daria characters and any useful content merged there. Polyamorph (talk) 07:45, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose. Otherwise I would support this but it seems she is the main protagonist of her own series, for which she deserves her own article. JIP | Talk 02:47, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.