This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
I believe the article should stay because the company is a leading microscope manufacturer. The other two Leica companies have extensive articles: Leica Camera, Leica Geosystems. Yury Petrachenko (talk) 20:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have withdrawn my Speed Deletion nomination. There seems to be more coverage of this company than I initially thought there would be:
Plus some of the results from Google Web Search would probably be usable. If I get a chance to, I'll look at some of those sources - but I won't get a chance until next week at the earliest. -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:12, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]