Talk:Lari White

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ChrisTofu11961 (talk · contribs) 03:20, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    I made some grammatical errors instead of having you do it. I do not like when other editors expect me to fix a period, when they could have just done it themselves. Some things to remember:
  • Be careful with your use of commas. You're often guilty of using too many when they are not really necessary.
  • Avoid references in the infobox. I recently learned that it's supposed to be a snapshot of the article (You already had referenced the fact she played guitar and piano in the article for example)
  • Avoid paragraphs that are too long. Some of the paragraphs I had to split.
  • Make sure most sections of the article include years. The "later career" section did not and it looked awkward (the early life section is OK to not include; I see that as optional)
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Excellent work here! I learned some more about Lari White. It's a shame I only know her from Cast Away. Thank you for making this a GA article!