Talk:Lake Placid 2

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Horror

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 6 January 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

I see an edit and revert war going on here.[edit]

If you have a problem with the article, talk about it on the talk page. Don't just keep deleting things without explanations. You can work to improve an article, not just do mass deletion. Dream Focus (talk) 02:24, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop stalking me. There is no edit war, its vandalism removal pure and simple. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:26, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not stalking you. Stop making that ridiculous conclusion. Whenever you have a dispute with another editor, you post on the talk page, you don't just post threats to have them banned on their user page. The editor has never made an article before. You need to explain how things are done, and not just start deleting. And it isn't vandalism. Dream Focus (talk) 02:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right...because you just happened to stumble on Lake Placid 2 out of boredum? He hasn't expressed any interest in learning how things are done nor anything else. When their edit was reverted, they posted it again to their user page to make it easier for them to copy/paste it back into the article over and over, particularly when its seems pretty obvious the content was taken from somewhere even if the source isn't readily identifiable. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 02:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

With Google, all things are readily identifiable. I just checked, and it doesn't appear anywhere else. It looks like just one guy writing a movie review. You could've explained things to him, but instead, just kept deleting things, without any discussion at all anywhere. And yes, I came here after seeing you on the Wikiquette alerts‎ page, and clicking on your name, to get a wider view of the conflict there. I am certainly not stalking you though. Most of my contributions to wikipedia, have nothing to do with any article you've been to. Now stay on topic please. We need to discuss things like mature adults, not just keep deleting things, and making threats. Dream Focus (talk) 03:06, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When you stop making personal attacks and adding snarky side remarks to everything you say, then we might have an actual discussion. And no, with Google all things are not readily identifiable...there are many many many things in this world which are not on Wikipedia...like thousands upon thousands of books, magazine articles, etc. -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:13, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What do you consider to be a personal attack or snide remark in my previous comment? Dream Focus (talk) 03:16, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Constantly saying "keep deleting things" and complaining about it. You want to discuss the article, discuss the article, but as you don't seem to have any actual interest in editing the article at all, I'm not sure what the point of this discussion is. The adding editor has not expressed any interest in communicating at all, just publishing their personal writings, violating WP:NOT -- AnmaFinotera (talk · contribs) 03:21, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]