Talk:Lacrosse/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MX (talk · contribs) 05:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Review

 Doing... Hello. This article has been in the GAN queue since November 2017 so I'll be happy to review it. Initial comments: there are a lot of unsourced paragraphs/sentences (some that I just added tags for) that need to be addressed immediately. My review consists of two parts; in part 1, I review each section and give grammar corrections/suggestions for the nominator to fix. In part 2, I check for close-paraphrasing and go into each source to see if the source supports the text. This is why we need to find the sources to the tags immediately, since this may delay or disqualify the article. The article is somewhat long so give me several days to review. Once I post back again here, that will be part 1. MX (✉ • ✎) 05:20, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• I've decided to wait until the "citation needed" tags are addressed before starting the review. I'm worried the text might be removed / drastically changed if new sources are introduced. I'll give this 7 days before failing. I've left a post in the article's talkpage to let other watchers know the situation. MX (✉ • ✎) 05:27, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

• @Mnnlaxer: Hi there. Would you be able to get to resolve the CN tags soon? I'd love to have that in place before I start the review process. Thanks, and let me know how I can help. MX (✉ • ✎) 04:01, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Sorry, I'll get to it tonight. Thanks! - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 20:44, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

I looked and there are too many for me to deal with right now. Please put this on hold or retract the nomination. Thanks for trying - Mnnlaxer | talk | stalk 15:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)

@Mnnlaxer: No worries. Thank you for letting me know. I'll be happy to review this article again in more detail in the future, just ping me. Good luck and reach out if you ever need me. MX (✉ • ✎) 16:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)