Talk:LG enV3 (VX9200)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 October 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Operating System?[edit]
The article doesn't mention which operating system the phone runs. It's not Symbian, Maemo, Windows Mobile, or anything else I'm familiar with. 68.44.112.108 (talk) 22:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
- According to this URL (Yahoo! answers), it is "Brew". I've never heard of that OS. But I don't know if this one counts as a very good source. I didn't look really close at my Yahoo! searches; I just got an answer so you know. If anyone can find a better source, would this be worth putting in the article? I don't imagine it would be too hard to find a source; I'm just too lazy. Good luck finding a source, whoever that may be. (I'm not being sarcastic--it's not hard to find; it really requires very little ambition, which I am afraid I'm running pretty low on tonight. 24.10.181.254 (talk) 03:01, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
"Controversies"[edit]
This section describes a problem that (at least according to the body of the paragraph) Verizon apparently was willing to fix. So why exactly is this a "controversy"? If the problem was fixed as is claimed, what is the "controversy"? My opinion is that the title to this section qualifies as Weasel Words. I'm just as unhappy as the next person if my phone is being goofy, and I never thought the day would come where I'm actually defending Verizon, but really...honestly, why consider it a controversy if Verizon did indeed replace the defective phones free of charge? Sounds like we could rename the title of this section to something like: "Defects in early versions of the enV3", though that title seems kind of long. Could someone please help me out on coming up with a more appropriate title? Regards, 24.10.181.254 (talk) 00:09, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
- No response, so I'll be bold and make the change to "Defects in early versions". Please feel free to contribute a better title for this section; I don't think mine is very good, but this "controversies" title definitely doesn't fit. 24.10.181.254 (talk) 02:26, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on LG enV3 (VX9200). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100426184152/http://verizonsaga.com/verizon-wireless/lg-env3-vx9200-phone-verizon-wireless/ to http://verizonsaga.com/verizon-wireless/lg-env3-vx9200-phone-verizon-wireless/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)