Talk:Knights Templar Cartel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Loaded Phrase/P.O.V./Editorializing[edit]

Although I'm not comfortable making the change myself when not logged in, it seems to me that this sentence (in addition to the missing 'S' in indoctrinates) is phrased in an inappropriately scolding tone:

"The Knights Templar cartel indoctrinate its operatives to "fight and die" for what they call "social justice"."

What's with the "what they call" in this? If the cartel is saying this (especially being directly quoted as saying it), we can assume that all the words have the meaning the cartel would ascribe to them. We wouldn't say that police departments indoctrinate their operatives to "protect" and what they call "serve". The reader can probably make an informed judgement for themselves whether cartels primary raison d'etre is social justice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.142.165.27 (talk) 17:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I DON'T GET IT[edit]

This isn't illegal: The Knights Templar Cartel indoctrinates its operatives to "fight and die" for "social justice". Well sounds good (hoping they investigate well first).

Drugs aren't illegal. Sometimes law complains of effects.

The definition of "Cartel" from Webster's 1913 doesn't even mention crime.

"The Resistance" says nothing of crime.

There isn't a single criminal complaint in the article. It says war but cites no battle. There is a "war" on everything but reducing taxes as far as I hear.

And as far as police I have some trying to steal my car. I'm not going to say whether police or cartel is more the good-guy. That's just my mileage.

But if you say so. I'll beleive half of what I hear :)

the b b c artilcle crosses it's testimony continually. it claims they deal drugs but are against it's use. claim the cartel protects residents and are against abuse but exthort. it claims "a leader" was caught but not of what gang. and claims this cartel was responsible for killing but never says the cartel claimed responsibility. finally: it says they've been accused not that a thing has been proven in any court.

what is clear is real conflict in the area and a conflict of interest. and the article looks nice. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.209.222.174 (talk) 19:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Links[edit]

>> Mexico catches Knights Templar cartel boss(Lihaas (talk) 06:08, 28 January 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Update needed[edit]

The article needs of some updating with regards to the beating this cartel is taking (took) from the organized vigilantes ("autodefensas"), and of the apparent transformation into the new cartel called "La Tercera Hermandad" (or H3), according to this article: http://www.excelsior.com.mx/nacional/2014/05/06/957619#cxrecs_s Cheers, --BatteryIncluded (talk) 02:23, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe not so. Seems there is a propaganda war from some front. Let's stand by. http://www.aztecanoticias.com.mx/notas/estados/190246/no-hay-nuevo-cartel-en-michoacan-castillo
BatteryIncluded (talk) 07:32, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Knights Templar Cartel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Knights Templar Cartel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:00, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Communication[edit]

Boundaries and borders within personal agendas Leosunstm (talk) 03:23, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]