Talk:Klubrádió

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

POV: Almost the whole article fails neutrality guidelines. One author has presented an opinionated and one-sided case that is biased against Klubrádió (including a description of 2011 bid process disputed by Human Rights Watch and the EU authorities). A second author has added a short section "Klub-rule" which is also one-sided in the opposite direction. Cartesian1 (talk) 12:59, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article is also inappropriately long (compare, e.g., to the article on Hungary's oldest national radio station, Radio Kossuth). I think an article similar in length and content to the German-language entry might be more appropriate; if it is longer, it should provide facts about the radio's programming structure and operations and a brief, neutral reference to the political controversy concerning its license, not a lengthy, heavily biased opinion piece focused almost exclusively on politics. This is Wikipedia, not the Readers' Comments section of Népszabadság or Magyar Nemzet. vttoth (talk) 18:39, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]