Talk:Kissing traditions

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

If anyone has any kissing traditions of their own, please add them! If you know the history/origins of the tradition or any other information, we would really appreciate more input.

instructor comment[edit]

Lead: "have become a fundamental part of all occasions." No meaning.

Bench: cite sources in article. last sentence is unclear and marred by typos. The language in this section is too close to the language of the source. Paraphrase must be completely in your own words; quotations appear inside quotation marks. This sentence is irrelevant: "Being the first class to present a school memorial, the class of 1912 had high hopes that following graduating classes would continue the tradition of leaving similar memorials."

Post: cite sources in text

Misteloe: This section properly integrates citations from a variety of sources, paraphrases rather than mixes quote and paraphrase, and includes references in text. Use this as a model for thttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrightshe rest of your article.

Wedding:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights link 5 is broken. I dont find source for this material.

New Years--no problem, nice writing

Blarney--link 7 is broken; wording is too close in reference 9

Games--informative and clear. Last sentence adds nothing

Frat boy--source?

Pope's Ring?--source?

Veneration of Icons--not enough about kissing. Both entry and source are on another subject.

This is close to a finished article. Please make edits indicated. However, the tradition of kissing as greeting we discussed in class is conspicuously absent. It would be the most widespread and interesting one to consider. The Wikipedia entry on kissing would be a good place to start getting information on it.

C+

Rudolph2007 15:20, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

comment on revision[edit]

Greetings section is much improved, using relevant references to Wikipedia and nice range of other sources

Monuments section is well organized though heading could be clearer. How about "Kissing Spots"?

left behind a magnificent stone bench in their wake. redundant

While the bench does enhance the beauty of the Syracuse University quad, the kissing bench has become much more than an ordinary seat. The tradition began--unnecessary words

Good work on Blarney stone and Ellis Island

The evolution of this kissing tradition has come a long way. No matter how it started, a kiss under the evergreen plant undoubtedly still holds meaning for us today. It’s safe to say that this holiday tradition will be around for years to come.--wordy; find the substance, delete the rest

Wedding Kisses--well written; informative and entertaining

influential to

Kissing Games--this whole section is delightful

the most primary form

Perhaps the most relevant topic regarding religious kisses is the kissing of feet.

This intriguing section swerves from kissing to washing. Can you bring it back?

Excellent revision that needs just a little more work. Research, writing, organization have come along very nicely.

The passage under the Kissing Bench at Syracuse University, where it states "Currently the tradition stands that if a man and woman kiss while sitting on the kissing bench they will eventually marry," is extremely heterosexist. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.119.216.180 (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rudolph2007 16:43, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

instructor comment 3[edit]

grade: A-

questions[edit]

What is the origin of the "??? & ??? sitting in a tree k-i-s-s-i-n-g" song? --Davidbessler 15:15, 20 October 2007 (UTC) I dont know, but it was common in New Zealand in the 1950s suggesting a British(maybe Irish) origin as NZ was not much influenced by any other culture before then.ie pre Tv and internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.58.189.177 (talk) 03:53, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Kissing traditions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:33, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Kissing traditions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Kissing traditions. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]