Talk:King the Land

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Em-dash on average ratings[edit]

@Paper9oll what's the purpose of em-dash on the average on the ratings table of an ongoing drama? Because others don't have that. ♒️ 98TIGERIUS 🐯 17:23, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@98Tigerius Em-dash has always been there as far as I'm aware of, years before you even created an account and started editing, it should only exists for ongoing series. For ended series, it's always (including those with N/A) an average calculation of whatever listed numbers, however those with N/A must be accompanied by efn tag stating "This average ratings is calculated based on the published ratings, the exact average ratings is unknown due to multiple ratings not published". Of course, this is provided that it's well-maintained not in terms of just sourcing and content, I do see plenty of recent articles not following this and of course looking through the page's history and deep diving into ... I can see why that's the case and how it became an "issue" (quotation intended to be read as Air quotes). In fact, the "issue" wasn't even one or if it's even one to begin with (well it doesn't exists years ago nor do I heard it was one to begin with), even heard of if it ain't broke, don't fix it. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 17:33, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Rhetorical Practices from the Ancient World to Enlightenment[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2024 and 30 April 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Gungi17 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Qukaine (talk) 23:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]