Talk:Kid Icarus/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 13:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Nice work!

In the Development section, you refer to the "best American ending" and one of the Japanese endings being "worse." Unless you have a source that states these things are "best" or "worse," you should not use weasel words. Will continue the review when these are addressed. ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 13:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 15:47, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Okay, now I'd like you to take a look at WP:LEDE and make your lede conform to those guidelines. There shouldn't be anything mentioned in the lede that is not in the article, and vice versa. Also, the lede should also touch on every section in the article. There's lots more on this at WP:LEDE. ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 16:31, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done...I Belive. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 17:08, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. Lastly, if you think Kid Icarus had an impact on later games/game development, you should include a "Legacy" section. If you can add that, and it looks good, I'll pass it. ɳorɑfʈ^Talk! 02:05, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Put in legacy, put some info and put that in the lead. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, this article passes.