Talk:Khasi people

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

A NEW DIMENSION IN THE ORIGIN OF THE KHASI PEOPLE

Khasi necklaces: a distant connection to Ainu culture?[edit]

Those necklaces that the Khasi girls in that nice photo are wearing strike me as being indistinguishable from Ainu tamasay. Given that there seems to be some distant genetic connection between the Austro-Asiatics and the Koreans/Japanese, is it possible that some proto-Korean or proto-Japanese group might have introduced the tamasay to the Ainu people's ancestors prior to the Altaicization of the proto-Korean/proto-Japanese populations? Just food for thought. Ebizur 18:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

rewrite[edit]

much of this article was directly lifted from the cited resource. the reference of this article is in the public domain but was written from what I can find about 100 years ago. the wording in this article is very offensive to me and is quite outdated. the use of "he" when talking about the people as a whole I find offensive and makes the article of lesser quality than I would hope wikipedia would strive for. also I find the "appearance" section bordering eugenic or even what we would now deem racist. out of all the other articles I have read on a people I can not recall one where the color of their skin is mentioned. also the wording in this section is completely condescending. for example "A Khasi loves a day out in the woods, where he thoroughly enjoys himself. If he does not go out shooting or fishing, he is content to sit still and contemplate nature." oh how nice. but seriously, how culturally imperialistic. this wording definitely dates the publication referenced and it is my belief that the article needs to be rewritten so as to at least give these people some dignity. --Tainter 12:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"related groups" info removed from infobox[edit]

For dedicated editors of this page: The "Related Groups" info was removed from all {{Infobox Ethnic group}} infoboxes. Comments may be left on the Ethnic groups talk page. Ling.Nut 20:35, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]




Links section: please remove link khasi.ws as it seems more interested in displaying dating ads than providing relevant information.

217.185.194.220 (talk) 10:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Meghalaya Addition[edit]

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Meghalaya workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Meghalaya or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag TALK2ME 16:01, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fond of dancing[edit]

Requesting a sensible cleanup... It would be one thing to describe cultural practices. Another to say fond of dancing for an entire tribe... Please address that Sannu Ki (talk) 05:32, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let's improve this page[edit]

This page had a good start but hanged and has not improved for one year. I have edited a number of minor things and added new data. Now on the points below I need the advice of others. I suggest that the portion on the Khasi language be moved to the Khasi language page and that only the linguistic affiliation of the language be mentionned.Coleshvar (talk) 18:56, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Matriarchal society[edit]

One of the few parts in the world where people rejoice when a girl, a daugther, is born, is a unique societal structure, which is found among the Khasi people... but unfortunately NOT in this page! The Khasi people live in a matriarchal, matrilinear, matrilocal society. This is unique and quite important (may be a role model?) One should emphasize that perhaps. --Peter B. Liebig (talk) 21:46, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khasi people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Khasi people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:57, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]