Talk:Keiron Cunningham

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Testimonial[edit]

Has Kezza had a testimonial year at all, he's been at Saints for 17 years now?

Ymron (talk) 15:23, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Keiron Cunningham. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:32, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"World's Best"[edit]

I removed this nickname from the article as it doesn't appear to be real. This article was cited as a source, but after a quick search no other news outlets seem to support this. I believe it may be a case of circular referencing, as an old version of this article included the nickname, only unsourced, and presumably the writer used Wikipedia to research his or her article without checking the facts. So in this case the citation should be disregarded. J Mo 101 (talk) 21:14, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen it written down elsewhere, and heard it on BBC coverage. but it's entirely feasible to believe that the written form and BBC coverage were also using this as a source. Still a little dubious as it involves presumption of guilt on our side. He was highly regarded at the time, and may look into another source to satisfy things, as it feels both right and wrong in almost equal measures to remove this nickname.Fleets (talk) 08:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/other-sports/king-keiron-knows-best-249649 http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/rugby-fans-vote-new-bronze-3362892 http://www.immortalsofbritishsport.com/2000-2013/keiron-cunningham/ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/rugbyleague/article-2940317/I-ve-gone-tearaway-Saints-job-says-St-Helens-legend-Keiron-Cunningham.html seen and heard him referred to as King a few times too. I take it that this addition would not offend?Fleets (talk) 09:29, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That seems to be acceptable, although I would perhaps cite this article rather than one of the tabloid papers. I'm not a huge fan of nickname fields in infoboxes as they're prone to vandalism, and there aren't nearly enough of us to keep watch on all rugby league articles, but as long as the nickname is notable and it's reliably sourced I have no problem with them. The previous one I felt was a bit dubious per my reasoning above. J Mo 101 (talk) 19:44, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]