Talk:Kalank

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Source for music?[edit]

The Mumbai Mirror cited source says that Pritam composed the music for one special song for this film. It does not say that he compossed the rest of the musing for it. A better source is needed. DES ^(talk)_{DESiegel Contribs} 22:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All music are produced by Pritam

Sreehari l s (talk) 13:01, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2019[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please add "Hussain Dalal" as the dialogue writer for Kalank. Looteraa (talk) 09:52, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:16, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

please add "Pawan Chopra" as "Roop's father" in the cast list of kalank

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Kpg jhp jm 01:56, 21 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Plot[edit]

If anything related to novel what body remember post ... don't believe it because there are some stupid ranveer and Deepika padukone fans who are jealous of this film Random begum (talk) 06:17, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Random begum Random begum (talk) 06:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Huh? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Budget[edit]

Please check these parameters before changing budget Parameters. Rickyurs (talk) 15:23, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Arslan-San: The problem with your recent edit here, is that across the board, for most films across the globe, when we contemplate a film's budget, we are considering the cost of production, not print and advertising costs. Those should never be included in a production budget. And if you look at Template:Infobox film instructions, you will note in the |budget= instructions, the following: "Insert the approximate production budget of the film. This is the cost of the actual filming, and does not include marketing/promotional costs (e.g. advertisements, commercials, posters)." So the inclusion of print and advertising costs creates a significant problem, because we can no longer compare or contrast Kalank's performance with other films. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:16, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb: @Krimuk2.0: Taran Adarsh has clearly stated that INR 150crore is the budget (including P&A). I agree that production budget of the film shouldnt include P&A. But 80 crore as production budget without P&A? That means 70 crore spent on P&A which is totally unacceptable since no producer with a right frame of mind, especially KJo, spends 70 crore on promoting 80 crore budget film. The 80 crore budget citation-source is incorrect and done by media just to reduce budget in order to declare this tanking film as commercial success.DarpSinghh (talk) 10:29, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Be that as it may, I still think the note about the print and advertising costs should be restored to the article, since ₹150 crore is apparently not the production budget. The note was removed in this edit by AutoRectify without adequate justification. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:29, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

otected edit request on 9 July 2019[edit]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

2409:4064:203:5608:0:0:1890:48A0 (talk) 03:32, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: no request made. Highway 89 (talk) 03:51, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Consent[edit]

PRACTICALITYOf this movie 101.0.45.189 (talk) 14:32, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022[edit]

Regarding these edits by the IPs [1] [2] [3]. Per Template:Infobox film, the parameter "|budget=" should mention only the 'actual cost of filming' not the marketing and advertisement costs. The exact words being → "This is the cost of the actual filming, and does not include marketing/promotional costs (e.g. advertisements, commercials, posters)". So per the source [4], the [Cost of Production Rs. 130 cr + Print & Advertising Rs, 20 cr], that is we have to write only 130 crore, not the total 150 crore. Hope I'm clear. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]