Talk:Kairan Quazi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Multiple issues: Need cleanup[edit]

I do not think this meets WP:N. Kairan is Intellectual gifted, but does not qualify as a Child prodigy, as he has not yet made any extraordinary achievement at the level of an adult expert. The article introduces him as a software engineer of SpaceX, which that does not make him notable alone. If the notability criterion is being the youngest in that profession, that needs to be specified clearly.

Bulk of the article is written by one person and the language indicates strong POV, so I suspect COI. Especially the quotes are very non-encyclopedic. Sabih omar 04:11, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your personal opinion is largely an arguable presumption. His story is well documented in reliable sources that are independent of the subject as any one can see from the citations. Wikipedia does not need "extraordinary achievement" for an article of an individual; a graduation along with employment based on educational credentials at his age is itself a notable achievement. Then, notice the "youngest" descriptions. Your suspicion on COI is absolutely wrong. How many people have that at 14? Do we expect even in the far future a horde of 14-year-old engineers to sit in SpaceX, or any other company? We don't. As a primary author, I openly declare that I don't know anything about the person other than what I read from the sources, and I live in the exact opposite side of his world; so, practically never heard of him, never seen him. I don't even know if he is real or fictional, but I rely on the sources. That's it. Chhandama (talk) 06:09, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clearing out any COI concern. But I am not convinced this fits WP:N. The number of teenage college graduates is not small, especially among people suffering from autism (Savant syndrome). The youngest ever to join a specific company does not make a subject worthy of an encyclopedia page either. And the language of the article is not encyclopedic at all (especially the anecdotes and quotes). I think this needs to go in an AfD discussion. Sabih omar 03:43, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You still do not understand the meaning of notability in Wikipedia. Chhandama (talk) 05:35, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not an autobiography[edit]

An {{Autobiography}} tag was added, making me to justify again. As a primary author, I openly declare that I don't know anything about the person other than what I read from the sources, and I live in the exact opposite side of his world; so, practically never heard of him, never seen him. I don't even know if he is real or fictional, but I simply rely on the sources. If there is any NPOV material, that must be my mistake and shortcoming, feel free to make the necessary edit. Chhandama (talk) 04:15, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]