Talk:Kaam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sikhism's Views on Pornography[edit]

I checked the articles you referenced and the book. The first link mentioned nothing at all about prostitution, pornography or anything else mentioned in this section. Further, the two google books mentioned do not exist. Upon further investigation it appears the entire purpose of this section was to serve as the basis for claiming Sunny Leone could not be Sikh. this whole section should either be appropriately sourced or deleted outright. Jgeddis (talk) 12:34, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

This was proposed in 2008, and even the flagging editor didn't discuss it, so I dropped the flag.- sinneed (talk) 14:35, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just giving everybody plenty of time to think of one single reason. Otherwise how about German desire French desire English desire..... the words kama and kam are the same. The other page deals with the subject from the POV of Hinduism, Buddhism and Theosophy - why not Sikhism? It is already enough that there is a page for a word that simply means desire, sex or lust. Why not have a special page for bicycle in every language of the world? Redheylin (talk) 03:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Taking that to extreme: we could make one truly gigantic article and redirect everything into different sections.
But why? "Kam" and "Kama" are not the same. Certainly they are related. Maybe an also. I won't oppose this strongly but I see no plus and some minus.- sinneed (talk) 04:33, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The last is what I am thinking. In fact, there is already an outline of the Hindu view in this article - it has been felt necessary to contrast the two. So why not go the whole hog? The two are the same word - at the most one is Sanskrit and the other Punjabi. And then let us go and sort out Hell! Redheylin (talk) 20:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OT *AAAAAAAHAHAHA man if we can sort out hell we will be famous! *cough cough* ok back to the subject. :) *ahem* :)/OT
Yes, I think the argument does have merit, but my concern remains. On the other hand (3rd hand?), no one had commented against for a good chunk of a year, so how serious could concerns be?

- sinneed (talk) 20:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What if we sort out wikihell and then we get to the other side and this angel says, right what are you; a christian, a sikh? We got different hells for everybody. Oh you are the guys who said it was all the same hell are you? Well, we made a special one JUST FOR YOU! And we spend the rest of eternity trying to edit a typo and everytime we do the browser crashes. Redheylin (talk) 01:13, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

"Kaam" Meaning as Widely Used in Hindi[edit]

Hi There, I think it fair to assume that people reading this page will be aware of basic hindi or punjabi dialects and realize that "kaam" literally actually means "work". What is being referred here is "kama" which is one of the Sikhism thieves.

Given the employment situation in the country, a lot of our politicians, including the PM, are using "kaam" very frequently in their speeches and lots of non-Indians are searching for this word only to come across the current wikipedia page which talks about "kaam" as a sikhism sin.

A request: can we please change the title to "kama" (which is also the sanskrit meaning) or change the content to reflect "kaam" meaning "any kind of work". Below are citations to support this. If we do the former (only change the title), we can create a new page for "kaam" if that's easier.

"Kaam" simply means "work" in Hindi, India's national language and below are the citations to support this. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5].

I am new to Wiki editing - would really appreciate any help anyone can provide.

Best, Nparwani (talk) 12:55, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

Copyright problem[edit]

This article has been tagged as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) It will likely be deleted after one week unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Major contributions by contributors who have been verified to have violated copyright in multiple articles may be presumptively deleted in accordance with Wikipedia:Copyright violations.

Interested contributors are invited to help clarify the copyright status of this material or rewrite the article in original language at the temporary page linked from the article's face. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. --MER-C 08:20, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved with a rewrite. MER-C 11:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]