Talk:K-179 (Kansas highway)

K-179 (Kansas highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 1, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Roads: State highways / Kansas Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Kansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:K-179 (Kansas highway)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) 22:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will review the article later. Are you sure you're done with the article?—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 22:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assuming you are, here's the review:

Are you sure that K-179 ends at K-2/K-44, not K-44?

That's probably the only problem in the article.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 23:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. That must have been an oversight while I was rewriting the article. T C N7JM 23:36, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, passing.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 23:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]