Talk:Käraste Bröder Systrar och Vänner

Käraste Bröder Systrar och Vänner has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 15, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Sweden Low‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Käraste Bröder Systrar och Vänner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Another review for you! --K. Peake 17:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'll have limited availability for a little while now. Should be able to respond to most items! Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

Why is the cello instrument not sourced in the body?
- It's sourced in the table. I've added it to Lyrics, where Bellman is the source.
"The epistle is dedicated" → "The epistle is subtitled"
- Edited.
The wine setting is not directly sourced in the body
- Edited, and added to Lyrics.

Background[edit]

Good

Song[edit]

Music and verse form[edit]

Audio sample looks good!
"each of sixteen lines." → "each consisting of sixteen lines."
- Done.
Wikilink tempo
- Done.

Lyrics[edit]

Good

Reception and legacy[edit]

Pipe to Bellman. Biografin should be on "her biography" only
- Done.
"Those form one side" → "These form one side"
- Done.
Merge the Bellman Society para with the above one
- Done.
"where it is" → "on which it is"
- This is correct in British English.
Imgs look good, apart from the part where a full-stop is used after an exclamation mark since this works as the ending punctuation
- Done.

References[edit]

Copyvio score looks totally undetectable!!!
WP:OVERLINK of Bellman Society on ref 14
- Done.

Sources[edit]

Good

External links[edit]

Good

Final comments and verdict[edit]

On hold until all of the issues are fixed; quite a short review this! --K. Peake 19:51, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, all done to date. Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:21, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Pass now, another solid job! --K. Peake 07:50, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]